A friend sent me a link to Laurie Goodstein's article in the
New York Times (
September 15, 2005) on the Vatican's current witch hunt for "'evidence of homosexuality' and for faculty members who dissent from church teaching" in Catholic seminaries. Hearing of this was the second opportunity I have had this year to call home and thank Bob for changing my life 16 years ago. The first occasion was the election of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger as pope on April 19.
I was a Catholic seminarian and priest in the Jesuit religious order for 13 years until I met Bob, and if I were still a priest today, I might feel as though I had wasted my life. Most of the forward-thinking Catholic men and women that I know have waited out Pope John Paul II's reign hoping that the church would finally move forward on matters, such as married and women priest, when he was gone. Ratzinger had hung like a specter over the changes of the Second Vatican Council for the past 40 years, but no forward thinking Catholic imagined he would become pope. Had I waited until I was almost 50 years old, as so many of my friends have, for post John Paul change, only to be saddled with Ratzinger at the lead, I would have been left worried and uncertain about the remaining years of my life; a life I had dedicated to ministry and the solitude of celibacy.
Now the other shoe has dropped. I need to say up front, in all my years in the Jesuits, from novitiate (the first two years of seminary), to the schools and parishes where I worked, to my graduate studies, at least half of the men in my communities were gay. At least half. Whether they were dealing with it or not. In graduate theology studies in Berkeley, two out of 12 guys in my immediate community could honestly say they were straight. The Jesuits were not alone in this. Other religious orders (Franciscan, Dominican, Holy Cross) appeared to have similar ratios of gay and straight members. Numbers and percentages get thrown around, but my experience tells me they are usually low.
It's also important to note that most of these men in these communities, almost all of them in fact, were living their vows of chastity. In the healthier communities, many were trying to understand their sexuality (gay, bi or straight) so as to become healthier human beings and better ministers.
So many questions are raised by the Vatican's new witch hunt for homosexuals in their seminaries. Is the Catholic Church prepared to lose more than half of their already dwindling ministry? Clearly the Vatican doesn't recognize the difference between homosexuality and pedophilia, but are they prepared to deal with more cases of inappropriate sexual behavior of all kinds as their priests bury their sexual feelings more deeply in secrecy and fear? And have they considered why so many of their seminarians are gay?
For me, I joined the Jesuits fresh out of high school in 1976. The Jesuit priests that taught at my high school were funny, intelligent, socially conscious, creative thinking men. Yes, I felt a calling and imagined I'd be a priest my whole life (as much as any 18 year old can). And yes, I wanted to do good things for people. But I also know that on a subconscious level I was attracted to the safety of religious community. No one, not my friends or my family, would ever have to know that I was gay. And everyone, especially friends and family, would regard my life choice with the same respect (maybe even more) that they gave to my brother and sisters who were married with families. Being a priest is about the only respectable option for a gay Catholic boy. The bachelor uncle doesn't receive the same esteem, and the life of a closeted married man is a nightmare most would not consciously choose.
Yet, while this may have been a strong subconscious motivator for my "vocation," I also wanted to be one of those funny, intelligent, socially conscious, creative thinking men that had taught me, and had I stayed, the current church would have made being any of those things very difficult, even suspect and dangerous. Gay rights in the church (my own or others) were important to me, but not as important to me as Catholic women's rights and the rights of married Catholics to minister, poverty, ignorance, and social injustice. I often wonder how much of a "problem" homosexuality would be for the Catholic Church if they dealt with any of these other issues more consistently, especially opening the priesthood to women and married men.
It will be interesting to see what the effect will be of the current inquisition. My guess is that it will reduce the number of Catholic priest significantly and cause more unhealthy behavior among those who remain. Maybe it will motivate more gay Catholics inside and out of the church's hierarchy to speak out, but I doubt that. Yet, certainly we may be witnessing the beginning of the end, the end of the Catholic Church as we know it, because a church cannot survive with a clergy that excludes women, married men and homosexuals.